Profit from DeMarker Divergences

Tom DeMarker is one of the most famous contributors to the technical analysis field and in time he has developed many indicators that bear his name. This one, the DeMarker indicator, is an oscillator that is offered for free to any trader that uses the MetaTrader4 platform. Other trading platforms are incorporating the DeMarker as well and even some other indicators like the DeMarker Sequential. However, these two are pretty much the only ones that can be found for free and can be used in analyzing markets. It doesn’t mean that the ones you have to pay for are better and will show you exact entry and exit levels. This is not the case as, like mentioned in other articles here on Forex Trading Academy, there is no holy grail in trading when it comes to technical setups. Some indicators may be more accurate and work better under specific circumstances, while others are giving best results in different environments. The DeMarker indicator fits in the oscillators category and therefore it is applied on the bottom of a chart. The same location as for any other oscillator is used this time as well: Insert/Indicators/Oscillators.


Broker Min Deposit Regulation Bonus Read More Visit Site
XTrade $100 CySEC 60% Read Review Visit Broker
XM $5 CySec 100% Read Review Visit Broker
HYCM $50 FSA $5000 Read Review Visit Broker

Clicking the DeMarker tab, a pop-up windows appears, giving the trader the possibility to choose the parameters to be used and the color and overall setup for this indicator. The usual caveat applies here as well: the bigger the period chosen, the more the indicator will flatten.
It is recommended to use the 14 periods, the default one, but a trader can actually pick any other period he/she considers suitable for achieving best results.

How to Use DeMarker Divergences

Before talking about divergences with this oscillator, we need to look a bit at its structure. The DeMarker travels only in positive territory, between the 0 and 1 level, and it is being considered, in many ways, as being similar with the Relative Strength Index (RSI). The reason for this comes from the fact that the 0.3 and 0.7 levels are considered to be oversold, respectively overbought levels. However, there’s a catch: as you’re going to find out when we’re going to talk about the RSI, on the DeMarker, the oscillator can stretch easily to values near zero or one. It is not the same for the RSI, where these levels are difficult to be reached. There are two ways to use DeMarker divergences: one is the classical way, namely to look for a bullish or bearish divergence to form in the overbought and oversold areas (above 0.7 and below 0.3) and another one is to bring into the equation the 0.5 level.

Classical Divergences with DeMarker

The classical way to use the DeMarker oscillator is to simply to look for bullish and bearish divergences that are forming within overbought and oversold areas. These divergences are easy to spot and identify and are extremely reliable. However, there’s one thing to consider: divergences in overbought and oversold areas are working very well in ranging markets. Otherwise, it may be that market stays in those areas for quite some time before reversing, if ever. Make sure you refer to our article dedicated to overbought and oversold areas.
The chart above shows the DeMarker being attached to the EURUSD four hours time frame and a classical bullish divergence can be spotted. In such a divergence, the price is making two consecutive lower lows, while the oscillator is not confirming the second low. The place to go long in this instance is after the oscillator moves back above the 0.3 level (so technically market is not in oversold level anymore) and the exit level should be after the DeMarker breaks the overbought level and dips below the 0.7. Right after the bullish divergence, the price I actually forming a bearish one, only this time thing is interpreted exactly the other way around. A bearish divergence calls for price making to consecutive higher highs, while the oscillator is not confirming the second high. Therefore, the thing is to go short on such a divergence, using the same logic like the one mentioned above. Again, all these are valid when markets are in a ranging environment, not a trending one.

Using the 0.5 Level with DeMarker Oscillator

Another way to use the DeMarker oscillator is to use the 0.5 level as the key for taking a trade. While on a classical divergence we should look for price and oscillator to show different moves on the second swing, this time we should look for the price and oscillator to make identical swings. The only thing that needs to be considered is that prior to these swings, the oscillator needs to break into the overbought territory (or above the 0.7 level) or into the oversold territory (or below the 0.3 level). In the first instance, one should look to buy on a dip below the 0.5 level when two swings with the DeMarker appear, or sell on a spike above 0.5 when two swings with the DeMarker appear as well.
The chart above illustrates the 0.5 setup and how the swings should be interpreted. While the first buying signal should be considered a risky one, aggressive traders may take it even though price did not break above the 0.7 level first. The second signal represents this theory perfectly as the oscillator is dipping below the 0.5 level after breaking the 0.7 first. A bearish scenario will call for a prior move below 0.3 and the oscillator to spike above 0.5 while not breaking the 0.7 level. To add a new level on an indicator, simply right-click on the screen and from the Indicator List chose the indicator to edit. Under the Levels tab, any level can be added. DeMarker is just another oscillator to be used to filter the moves market is making and it should be considered that in some ways the signals offered by DeMarker are more accurate than the ones offered by the Relative Strength Index (RSI). I tend to disagree with this statement, but more about the RSI you’ll find out in the next article here on Forex Trading Academy.

Was the information useful?
DeMarker Divergences
5 (100%) 1 vote